Massive 11 turbine wind farm appeal dismissed by Secretary of State

Good news at last, regarding The Big Field Wind Farm, Week St Mary, as the Secretary of State today dismisses the appeal.  Well done and thank you to all those who campaigned over such a long time against this massive wind farm, which would have been a blight on the landscape for miles around in this corner of North Cornwall bordering Torridge.  We’re glad to have done our bit to help.

In February 2014, an application was made to Cornwall Council for the development of a massive 11 turbine wind farm near Week St Mary.  In October 2014 the application was refused by Cornwall Council on the grounds of the adverse impact on the character and appearance of the surrounding area and on numerous heritage assets.  Wind farm developer Good Energy Generation Ltd appealed the decision and a public inquiry was held by Planning Inspector Mr Paul Griffiths in April and May 2016.

The local campaign group Campaign Against Rural Exploitation (CARE) provided three witnesses against the proposal and many local residents gave statements to the inquiry opposing the wind farm.

On 27th October 2016 the Inspector reported to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, recommending that the appeal be dismissed on the grounds that “the adverse impacts of granting planning permission for the proposal, in terms of the harm that would be caused to the significance of designated heritage assets, the landscape in general, and the scenic beauty of the AONB, would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits”.  With regard to the Written Ministerial Statement (WMS) of 18th  June 2015, the Inspector stated that “the impacts identified by the affected local communities are not and cannot be made acceptable and that the proposal does not have the backing of the local community”.  On 26th July 2017 the Secretary of State agreed with the Inspector’s recommendation and dismissed the appeal.

At CPRE Devon, we believe that this long drawn-out process has been very stressful to the local community and has cost them a great deal of time and money.  It has been totally unnecessary as it has been obvious all along that the wind farm would have been a massive blight on the local landscape and would be unacceptable.  Hopefully with the removal of the massive subsidies to wind turbines, with the tighter planning rules now in place requiring suitable locations for wind turbines needing to be identified on a Local Plan or a Neighbourhood Plan, and with proposals needing the backing of the local community, we have seen the back of any more wind turbines or wind farms blighting our wonderful countryside.

related posts

North Devon travellers site planning consent quashed by High Court

Devon CPRE welcomes the decision to quash planning consent for a travellers’ site in Charles, a rural hamlet in the North Devon countryside near Brayford…

Read Post

Understanding the Grid Seminar – Monday 26th October 2026, Hatherleigh Community Centre, 11am-1pm.

With communities across Devon facing a growing number of proposals for solar farms, Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS), larger wind turbines, offshore wind farms and…

Read Post

Planning Workshop 2026 – Whats new in the NPPF? Is this the end of democratic planning?

Planning Workshop. Friday 20th November 2026. 10.30- 12.30pm at The Devon Suite, Exeter Court Hotel, Kennford, Exeter EX6 7UX (The hotel is conveniently situated on…

Read Post

Plot to make North Devon an AI Growth Zone uncovered

A plan to have an area of Northern Devon designated an AI Growth Zone by the government has been revealed following the release of documents…

Read Post

East Devon BESS – Appeal dismissed

Devon CPRE and East Devon residents’ action group celebrate dismissal of an appeal for a BESS sited above an aquifer In a victory for the…

Read Post

160 dwellings – Lagoon View, Yelland, Barnstaple

We’ve submitted a comprehensive objection to this planning application (North Devon District Council 82214). The proposal would introduce a substantial residential development of 160 dwellings…

Read Post