Planning Reform Proposals

The Government has presented us with a raft of complex changes to the planning system, many of which we feel are unhelpful. Just keeping pace with the “Localism Act”, the “National Planning Policy Framework” and now the “Growth & Infrastructure Bill” have threatened to overwhelm those of us trying to look after all that is best for the Devon countryside and those who live and work there.

This “Dash for Growth” is manifesting itself in many ways and we are now seeing planning applications for dozens of wind turbines, huge solar farms, large housing estates on Greenfield sites and much else besides. We see local District and Unitary Councils without a Local Plan in place by Easter being “open for sustainable development”. We see a future of the planning system being decided by the Planning Inspectorate, either on strategic grounds or at appeal, if local authorities are incompetent or perform badly. Real “Localism” seems to be increasingly meaningless. If you wish to get a feel for the arguments see the BBC Sunday Politics Show here.

If you are interested in the change of use for buildings, extensions to homes or business premises, the ‘right to light’ and many other issues, this a document that you should read. It provides hyper links to all the main Government documents should you wish to read them. Our grandchildren will not thank us if our legacy to them is a landscape despoiled and battered by random industrial structures and ugly housing. It is up to all of us to do something about it. Read this document here.

related posts

Our Response to the Government’s Land Use Framework – 19th March 2026

Our farmland is facing a ‘land crunch’ as solar, housing and other demands compete for space. Yesterday (Wednesday 18 March), the government published England’s first Land Use Framework, which it claims will play a central role in delivering food security, clean energy, nature restoration and new homes over the coming decades. Here's our response: Devon CPRE Chairman, Steve Crowther says: “Devon CPRE was warning farming

Read Post

East Devon Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) – Public Inquiry starts 10th March

East Devon community urgently seeks funds to fight two landmark Appeals into proposed Battery Energy Storage Systems  Devon CPRE is backing residents around the rural…

Read Post

150MW Battery Energy Storage System (BESS), Axminster – At Appeal

An inquiry is due to commence on 10th March 2026, and scheduled to last for 4 days, regarding the application for a BESS on Land South of Hazelhurst, Raymonds Hill, Axminster (East Devon District Council reference number 24/0096/MFUL) (Appeal: APP/U1105/W/25/3369854). We strongly objected to the proposal because it would be a massive industrial complex of 27 acres located in the open countryside, in an area

Read Post

More houses for Halwill Junction, Torridge?

Despite a previous appeal for a new housing development in Holly Lane being dismissed, a new application has been submitted to Torridge District Council for 20 dwellings (ref 1/0020/2026/FULM). We have submitted an objection because the current proposal does not meaningfully address the Inspector’s previous concerns and does not overcome the reasons why the earlier scheme was dismissed.

Read Post

Application for 120 dwellings on the Callington Road, Tavistock, faces strong opposition

There has been a large outcry of opposition from local residents to this latest planning application for new houses in Tavistock, with many people fearing that the roads and services in and around the town just can't cope with any more. We have submitted a comprehensive objection to the application (ref 3771/25/OPA). Approximately 91% of the site is classified as Grade 3a agricultural land, which

Read Post

Another large housing development at Ottery St Mary, East Devon

We have submitted a comprehensive objection to the latest application for 63 dwellings on land east of the Sidmouth Road (ref 26/0094/MOUT). East Devon District Council's own evidence base Site Selection Report Ottery St Mary (Sept 2024 p 36-38) concluded this site should not be allocated due to landscape sensitivity, heritage considerations, infrastructure constraints, highway limitations, and high-quality agricultural land. There has been no change

Read Post